Score + - 0 Report post.
Posted on 2013-07-25 13:18:27 by Grim
Remove | Add note | Keep | Edit | Note history | Tag History | Previous | Next
8 comments (0 hidden)
Anonymous
Posted on 2013-07-25 17:10:21 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
How is this not below the 'standards'?
Mindwipe
Posted on 2013-07-25 19:21:25 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I can't really spot anything glaringly wrong with it...
Anonymous
Posted on 2013-07-25 22:49:00 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
It's worst overall quality than something that was removed earlier this week.
Mindwipe
Posted on 2013-07-25 23:51:18 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
That's very much an opinion-based statement, but in any case, we tend to be somewhat easier on original art than manips (note that most of what is removed are manips), because original art is harder to make. We also try to only flag pics we can spot noticeable errors in. In this case, the only thing I could really take any issue with is the jittery outlines, and that's not too big of a deal. After all, we allow sketches and oekaki drawings. Everything else is fine, really. The proportions seem right. There's no major lack of detail. The coloring is fine...
All I could really list are nitpicks that aren't worth deleting it for, imo. Do I personally like this style? No, not really. But I can't come up with any reason to flag it that isn't "I don't care for it".
Vanndril
Posted on 2013-07-26 03:57:36 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I'd not fap to this, myself. But to be fair, Mindwipe's summary of quality concerns more or less hits the spot. If you look at the individual aspects of the art, the only real downside to it is the fact that the outlines are all squiggly.
voyer
Posted on 2013-07-26 05:25:48 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
As the original artist, it's amusing to me that you all are arguing about retaining this one, rather than my goofy cartoon about the turkey god which Grim also posted.
Vanndril
Posted on 2013-07-26 07:35:40 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
You know what they say, voyer. Subjectivity can get confusing.
Grim
Posted on 2013-07-26 11:38:00 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I suppose I can see it - some of voyer's hands were kind of jagged, and perhaps this one was a slight cut above the rest? But honestly for me, ideas always play a greater part of what I can fap to, and voyer does have some very nice ideas... nabs too, but his work can't pass
then again I'm putting a picture of dog's playing D&D on my wall, so I'm no man of great taste
Posted on 2013-07-25 13:18:27 by Grim
Remove | Add note | Keep | Edit | Note history | Tag History | Previous | Next
8 comments (0 hidden)
Anonymous
Posted on 2013-07-25 17:10:21 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
How is this not below the 'standards'?
Mindwipe
Posted on 2013-07-25 19:21:25 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I can't really spot anything glaringly wrong with it...
Anonymous
Posted on 2013-07-25 22:49:00 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
It's worst overall quality than something that was removed earlier this week.
Mindwipe
Posted on 2013-07-25 23:51:18 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
That's very much an opinion-based statement, but in any case, we tend to be somewhat easier on original art than manips (note that most of what is removed are manips), because original art is harder to make. We also try to only flag pics we can spot noticeable errors in. In this case, the only thing I could really take any issue with is the jittery outlines, and that's not too big of a deal. After all, we allow sketches and oekaki drawings. Everything else is fine, really. The proportions seem right. There's no major lack of detail. The coloring is fine...
All I could really list are nitpicks that aren't worth deleting it for, imo. Do I personally like this style? No, not really. But I can't come up with any reason to flag it that isn't "I don't care for it".
Vanndril
Posted on 2013-07-26 03:57:36 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I'd not fap to this, myself. But to be fair, Mindwipe's summary of quality concerns more or less hits the spot. If you look at the individual aspects of the art, the only real downside to it is the fact that the outlines are all squiggly.
voyer
Posted on 2013-07-26 05:25:48 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
As the original artist, it's amusing to me that you all are arguing about retaining this one, rather than my goofy cartoon about the turkey god which Grim also posted.
Vanndril
Posted on 2013-07-26 07:35:40 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
You know what they say, voyer. Subjectivity can get confusing.
Grim
Posted on 2013-07-26 11:38:00 Score: 0 (vote Up/Down) (Report as spam)
I suppose I can see it - some of voyer's hands were kind of jagged, and perhaps this one was a slight cut above the rest? But honestly for me, ideas always play a greater part of what I can fap to, and voyer does have some very nice ideas... nabs too, but his work can't pass
then again I'm putting a picture of dog's playing D&D on my wall, so I'm no man of great taste
1